Quash the “White Space” with Four Management Tools

You contact a company trying to get a problem solved and you find yourself passed between multiple departments. While people are sympathetic, their response is, “It’s not my job.” Despite multiple voice mails and e-mails, you get nowhere. Your issue has fallen into the company’s “white space,” the cracks between the boxes on the organization chart. 

You’ve probably experienced white space issues inside your own organization, too. People perform departmental tasks smoothly, but there’s friction interacting with other groups. Processes don’t flow. Often things get “thrown over the wall,” there’s lots of finger-pointing, and it’s difficult to get things done.  

Functional silo-ism first rears its ugly head when companies reach about 40 employees. At this threshold, companies must departmentalize to increase technical capabilities and bolster management’s span of control. But priorities slowly begin to shift. Soon pleasing the boss becomes more important than making customers happy. As the firm continues to grow, functional barriers get larger and more entrenched. Left unchecked, departmental relationships can become adversarial, paralyzing new product development, service delivery, customer acquisition, and customer care efforts. 

Four tools that reduce silo-ism 

Progressive companies deploy countermeasures to mitigate the effects of white space behavior. Top organizations combine the four management practices below to substantially diminish internal friction and dramatically increase performance. 

1. Hoshin Kanri

What it is: Developed in the 1960’s at the Bridgestone Tire Company in Japan, hoshin kanri (literally translated “a bright, shiny needle”) is a rigorous, integrated system of planning, implementation, and review that points the way like a compass needle. Caterpillar, 3M, Toyota, Bosch and Danaher and many other leading companies use it. 

How it works: Senior executives collaborate to prioritize common issues, and then decide on a single breakthrough. The objective is then decomposed into a smaller set of strategies, each featuring its own executive owner and performance measure. Leaders cascade the plan throughout the organization, finally defining implementation plans at lower levels. Formal hoshin reviews then roll up progress, allowing executives to eliminate barriers that crop up. The method’s closed-loop system promotes intense focus, relentless execution, and forward momentum. 

Why it works: Unlike the common Management by Objectives (MBO) approach, hoshin aligns the organization around business, not functional, imperatives. Leaders pass these priorities down and reinforce them across the company. As a result, teams work towards enterprise-wide goals that transcend parochial concerns. 

2. Process Mapping

What it is: A time-honored technique used to study workflows, process mapping reveals the “hidden factory” behind service work. Describing the process visually helps teams identify critical handoffs, gaps, rework loops, and queues. After pinpointing improvement areas, teams can then reduce errors, speed cycle times and reduce costs. Value Stream Mapping and Customer Journey Mapping are popular variations of the method.  

How it works: Teams define process suppliers, inputs, outputs, customers, and requirements. Then they brainstorm tasks that must be completed to convert inputs into outputs, typically using Post-it® notes and butcher paper to record the workflow. Along the way, mapping participants identify improvement opportunities. 

Why it works: Mapping allows people to see the systemic nature of business—everything is connected to everything else, and what happens in one area affects all others. People quickly realize that fast, efficient, customer-pleasing workflows trump choppy, disconnected vertical structures. Top organizations assign executives to lead cross-functional, key business processes, holding them accountable for optimizing teamwork across, rather than inside, department boundaries. 

3. Enterprise Dashboards

What it is: The Japanese call an interlinked system of color-coded metrics nichijo kanri, or “daily control.” These displays help people at all levels manage the variables that lead to favorable business outcomes. Each manager’s dashboard typically monitors the key business process he or she oversees using 8-10 essential metrics that describe volume, time, cost, quality or other attributes. 

How it works: Leaders define the critical few measures that really matter by analyzing company processes, economic models, and Value Propositions. They calibrate indicators by determining ranges of acceptable values based on stakeholder requirements, process capabilities and business goals. Managers then collect data act appropriately on the signal: “green” means everything is good, “yellow” means keep an eye on it, and “red” means take immediate action. 

Why it works: With the right metrics, managers and teams focus on the most essential aspects of the job. They keep things under control and prevent downstream chaos. At top companies, executive dashboards reflect measures tied to cross-functional processes. When reward and recognition is tied to systemic improvement, managers and employees have greater incentives to work with other teams for mutual benefit. 

4. Lean Six Sigma

What it is: Lean Six Sigma is the modern integration of two proven methods: lean production and six sigma quality. Lean (a technique pioneered by Toyota in the 1970s) emphasizes speed and helps identify and eliminate wasted time, motion, and raw materials. Six Sigma (a quality method named after an imperceptibly small error rate) aligns processes with customer needs and then reduces defects and excessive variation that causes dissatisfaction. Both have been used for years in manufacturing, and the combined approach is increasingly common in service environments. 

How it works: Teams use formal methods to characterize process performance, estimate financial impact, uncover root causes of problems, design solutions, and implement changes. DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) or RIE (Rapid Improvement Events) provide teams with structure and statistical tools to effectively manage projects. Since teams make systemic improvements, results tend to be more dramatic and sustainable.

Why it works: Teams are often made of up representatives from all functions involved in the workflow. By working together towards common business goals, team members learn to appreciate the challenges people face in other functional areas. Besides creating more effective and efficient processes, a broader “systems view” and stronger interpersonal bonds between people promotes greater cooperation long after the project is complete. 

White space problems are a natural part of organizational development. All companies deal with it in one way or another. Fortunately, proven tools and techniques can help young companies arrest its impact and promote scalable growth. 

Why SaaS Needs Lean Six Sigma

The cloud computing industry loses about $10B every year due to customer churn, and in response, many executives launch improvement initiatives. They assign Customer Success teams to engage new customers, increase product usage and probe for sales opportunities. Other times, executives hold developers accountable for monitoring online customer behaviors and designing stickier user interfaces. Marketers sometimes get into the act, countering revenue losses through new customer engagement programs or by introducing renewal incentives. 

These isolated activities can incrementally reduce churn, but customer defection is a complex, enterprise-wide problem that requires joint effort. Customers leave when a number of deficiencies in sales, development, marketing, operations, and even accounting combine to frustrate them. Instead of assigning a single function or diluting efforts among multiple groups, SaaS companies should address customer attrition holistically with a disciplined and coordinated Lean Six Sigma approach.

Proven and unified

For decades, manufacturing and service organizations have used quality improvement techniques to satisfy customers, save money and increase revenue. Companies have shown repeatedly that relying on personal perceptions and making snap decisions leads to treating symptoms, not underlying causes. Using formal techniques, practitioners first explore difficulties from the customer’s perspective and then analyze data to uncover and resolve “root causes” of problems. As a result, improvements people make are dramatically better and more sustainable. Studies show that companies proficient in quality improvement practices consistently outperform rivals in growth and profitability by a factor of 2:1.¹

Quality methods have evolved over the years to help teams be even more successful. Modern Lean Six Sigma techniques include rigorous financial analyses to target improvements and demonstrate monetary gains. Lean principles remove wasted time and effort, speeding cycle times in engineering, production, and service operations. But best of all, Lean Six Sigma espouses cross-functional teamwork instead of working independently. Ineffective, inefficient workflows and fumbled handoffs between departments are often the most significant obstacles. When greater customer focus and scientific methods combine with better coordination and cooperation, solutions transcend internal boundaries and deliver maximum impact.

Lean Six Sigma in action

A young firm introduces an app that allows people to capture and annotate photos taken on mobile devices. The software then automatically uploads images and links them with documents the user stores in the cloud. During early trials, the founders discover that the software has widespread appeal, so they introduce the product at a low price point, expecting it to sell in high volume. 

But after several months, the executives discover a problem. Monthly customer churn numbers run far above expectations. Rather than settling for myriad, piecemeal solutions, the executives form a cross-functional Lean Six Sigma team to address the issue from a broader and deeper perspective. The project follows DMAIC, the phased improvement process at the heart of Lean Six Sigma:

Define. The problem is straightforward: 2.2% of users cancel their subscriptions each month, costing the firm $5M annually. The team establishes a goal to significantly reduce this number.

Measure: Despite having extensive data on mobile and website usage patterns, the team realizes that little is actually known about their customer churn. Marketing had originally decided to capture only basic contact information in order to reduce sales “friction” during the sign-up process. As a result, there’s no data classifying behaviors by market segment. In addition, the team finds few customers complete the online exit survey upon cancellation, so the reasons why customers leave are unknown. The team hires a third party to collect the missing information. The vendor uses billing records to e-mail and call a sample of departed customers to ask questions about their experience.  

Analyze: The vendor finds that the company indeed attracts a wide range of customers, but after using Lean Six Sigma’s Pareto analysis, the analyst shows that just a handful of segments account for the majority of churn. Surprisingly, estimators at small auto body shops are the largest defecting group. Challenged with extensive visual inspections and impatient customers during peak times, auto estimators purchase the mobile app hoping to speed their quoting process by quickly capturing images and making shorthand notes for later documentation. But the estimators learn that the time they spend copying photos into their company quoting systems negates the time they save with customers. Getting assistance from the software firm to solve the problem isn’t easy. The company’s limited self-help resources and e-mail-only, 2-day customer response time prompts most estimators to abandon the idea after just a few months. 

The team then examines internal factors. Investigating the technical issues, they learn that the company’s online database can’t exchange data in the formats commonly used by repair quoting systems. Customers buy software online and the firm provides no special attention or information to help estimators in the beginning. The company’s heavily burdened customer support team handles all tickets on a first-come, first-served basis, forcing customers to wait equally long periods for help. When estimators get into trouble, their options are few. It’s no wonder they’re leaving in droves.  

Improve: The team enhances the product and redesigns the process to make estimators more successful. Engineers research the most common exchange formats and discover they can develop an API that automatically imports images into quoting systems without the need for manual intervention. The plan calls for Marketing to add a single question during the sign-up procedure to assign each user to their respective market segment, allowing the company to better track behaviors. The team then proposes hiring a Customer Success Manager to reach out each estimator within a day of their subscription to help integrate the API, ensure the estimator gets the results he or she desires, and create a stronger working relationship. The team advocates “triage” (a Lean Six Sigma technique) in Customer Support to separate the estimators’ trouble tickets and deal with them first. Thanks to the use of simple statistical tools, the team calculates that the improvements will recover about $1.5M in lost revenue. Adding up the cost of implementation, the team finds the expense makes up a small fraction of the segment’s expected customer lifetime value. Management gives the go-ahead and the team coordinates and implements the changes. 

Control: Estimators are delighted with their new experience. Churn drops 82% in the segment and more auto shop estimators join based on strong recommendations from their associates. Overall, the company’s monthly churn drops by 38%, boosting topline annual revenue by $1.9M. What’s more, estimators who left come back, generating another $220K in revenue. Product managers notice new product and service opportunities in the market segment, promising to grow it even further. The Lean Six Sigma team then standardizes the approach and turns its attention to next group of departing customers. They repeat the DMAIC cycle and lower churn even further. 

It’s a better way

Had each SaaS company function done what they naturally do and worked within their own silos, the results would not have been the same. They would have proceeded without an in-depth understanding of their customers’ challenges. Functional leaders would have prioritized their activities around their favorite projects or according to whatever was most pressing at the time. As a result, improvements would have been typically myopic and disjointed, failing to benefit specific customers or deliver clear economic gains. 

Perhaps it’s time for a different strategy. The Lean Six Sigma method encourages SaaS functions to join forces, focus intently on customers, develop comprehensive solutions, and achieve more impressive results. A holistic improvement strategy may be just what the industry needs to retain more customers. 

Excel-lens is a publication of Service Excellence Partners. We increase customer loyalty and business performance in the cloud computing industry. Contact us today.

Source:
1. Hendricks, K. and Singhal, V. March, 2000. The impact of Total Quality Management (TQM) on financial performance: evidence from quality award winners. DuPree College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology

Is Your Customer Success Team a QA Department in Disguise?

A revolutionary change may be at hand.

Many Customer Success teams work with customers to help them learn and deploy new software in order to increase usage and build relationships at a critical time in the customer lifecycle. Others perform an important account management role, providing ongoing support and generating renewals. Often, however, CSM teams fill their days responding to customer complaints or being pressured to push upgrades to compensate for high churn. If CSMs spend most of their time mending frayed relationships or engaging in retention heroics, managers should be concerned—perhaps the Customer Success function is really there because the company lacks successful customers. 

Sound familiar?  Take heart. This situation is reminiscent of the transformation that occurred in manufacturing Quality Assurance departments not long ago. The important lessons they learned can help you lead your SaaS organization out of the problem-solving dark ages and into a problem-prevention renaissance. 

Learning from the Quality Movement

Reeling from tough economic times in the late 1970’s, Americans needed answers. Japanese brands Sony and Panasonic had decimated the American consumer electronics industry, while Toyota, Honda, and Nissan were busy thumping the Big Three auto makers. The Japanese produced significantly higher quality, lower cost goods, and consumers everywhere snapped them up. From the Rust Belt to Silicon Valley, the once-dominant American manufacturing industry was in crisis. 

Then in 1980, NBC News ran a program entitled, “If Japan can… why can’t we?” The show revealed how the quality improvement methods we taught the Japanese after World War II helped them beat us at our own game. Dr. W. Edwards Deming’s work with the Japanese challenged conventional notions that high quality must come at a high cost. Their global success proved that high quality meant far less waste and rework, lower costs, more reliable products, and happier customers. 

American industry got the message. After losing its way during the post-war boom, it was time for a new start. Led by Motorola, Alcoa, Ford, and many others, manufacturing rebounded by rediscovering quality methods, revamping operations, and regaining lost market share. Today, defects are no longer measured in percentages but in parts per million. It’s all due to a fundamental shift—manufacturers now achieve high quality not through inspection and remediation but by designing it into products and processes in the first place. Gone are large “test and fix” Quality Assurance operations, thanks to robust product designs, high capability production lines, and responsive supply chains. The modern, lean Quality function no longer requires scores of repair technicians but a select few quality consultants working upstream to ensure improvement never ends. 

Enlightenment in Customer Success

Just as manufacturing defects crippled manufacturing companies, experiential defects now rob SaaS companies of millions in revenue each year. Too often after buying SaaS offerings, customers find features lacking, software difficult to use, information hard to find, and support frustrating and unresponsive. This leads to churn.

When your Customer Success team becomes a de facto “save desk,” it’s behaving just like the Quality Assurance department of old, reacting to problems rather than adding value from the start. Worse, factors affecting churn can appear at multiple points in the process, but these problems get funneled to the Customer Success team in the name of “efficiency.” As a result, the team spends its time solving avertible problems at great expense. 

To remedy the situation, SaaS leaders must shift their focus to prevent churn in the first place:
• Create better products 
• Deliver better services
• Strengthen customer relationships 

To accomplish these goals, it’s critical to address the negatives that make customers leave and the positives that make them loyal. Leaders must dig deeper to uncover the cause-and-effect relationships that lead to better results. Doing so eliminates frustrations, saves time and money, and grows revenue through more successful installed-base sales campaigns. Given relatively low barriers to entry and increasingly crowded markets, companies that keep and grow hard-won market share will be the survivors when SaaS markets inevitably shake out most of the competition. 

Joining the Renaissance

The spark that ignites change is close at hand. Now more than ever, SaaS executives and investors understand the financial consequences of customer churn, emphasizing continuous improvement and analyzing customer use patterns and satisfaction data to drive software revisions. Executives are also beginning to look beyond the technology and to the people using it, placing greater importance on the overall customer experience. They see that the art of up-selling, cross-selling, and referral selling begins with a clean canvas of happy customers. As helpful visualization and predictive analytics technologies arrive on the market and teams adopt time-tested process improvement disciplines, your SaaS company can build customer loyalty that transcends software development and involves all aspects of the business.  

Excel-lens is a publication of Service Excellence Partners. We increase customer loyalty and business performance in the cloud computing industry. Contact us today.

Is your Company Leading or Firefighting?

Some companies never seem to have their act together. Others run like well-oiled machines. How does yours operate?  

Organizational behaviors exist on a continuum. From most chaotic at the base to most disciplined at the apex, the maturity pyramid shows where companies tend to fall. It was conceived by quality guru Philip Crosby¹ and later used in various forms by Hewlett-Packard,² the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program,³ and others. Where does your organization fit? 

1. Firefighting. The organization is highly reactive, relying on heroics to get things done. Success depends on circumstances, individual strengths, and plenty of luck. Getting sales is the primary focus, and any customer who buys is considered valuable. While the environment may be very creative, there’s typically a lot of stress and finger-pointing, customers are often disappointed, and mistakes are frequently repeated. The company does little to no planning, except possibly annual budgeting, and has limited employee training. 
2. Control. The organization becomes more aware of processes and takes steps to ensure consistency and repeatability. Checklists, inspection points, and reviews begin to appear, and more often groups coordinate their work. Sales qualification gets better as the company understands some customers are more valuable than others. Some metrics are in place, and annual planning begins to include goals and key initiatives. Execution is spotty, but improving. The company considers employee training important and screens new hires. 
3. Continuous Improvement. The organization uses formal techniques to systematically improve products, services, and the processes that produce them. Managers and staff are mostly proactive, with the exception of dealing with the occasional hiccup. Metrics are aligned and used extensively, and planning includes a clear vision with short-term and long-term goals. The company successfully executes about half of its planned initiatives. Market segmentation begins to drive development, marketing and sales strategy, and offerings get consistently better. Training is structured and delivered enterprise-wide. Executives carefully construct and manage supply and distribution chains. 
4. Optimization. The organization’s plans and processes are well aligned and integrated, and potential risks are often identified and resolved in advance. Through a history of continuous improvement and targeted innovation, the company has developed “core competencies” that create competitive advantages and open up entirely new markets. Despite its size, the organization is customer-focused, agile, and routinely introduces successful products and services. Enterprise-wide change initiatives are executed effectively. The company plans and manages human capacity and capability over a multi-year horizon. Cross-functional teamwork is high and organizational learning is methodical and widespread. 
5. Leadership. A market-maker, the organization uniquely balances the "yin and yang" of creativity and discipline. The company experiments incessantly with breakthrough ideas, carefully evaluating the ones that work, and only then scales up and introduces them. Competitors struggle to keep up. The press lionizes the company’s methods as “best practices." Despite perennial successes, the company remains on guard against complacency. It quickly detects disruptive shifts in technology, world events, and competitive innovations and mounts strategic responses. 

It’s probably no surprise that firefighting produces erratic outcomes. These companies tend to be new, small, or niche players, and they must fight to survive. Organizations with control orientations experience better success rates. Their customers are more often satisfied and buying again, and results are stable and predictable. These companies are “up-and-comers.” Firms doing a good job of continuous improvement are gaining ground, responding to market changes and becoming top competitors in their industries. Studies have shown that over a five-year period, these firms grow revenues and operating incomes twice as fast as those with control or firefighting behaviors.⁴ Companies optimizing performance are highly regarded and generally maintain top market positions. Examples include Boeing, IBM, Fed-Ex, and Toyota. Finally, a very small number of leading firms dominate their markets for fifteen years or more, producing at least ten times the return on shareholder equity than anyone else in the sector.⁵ They include Southwest Airlines, Intel, and Progressive Insurance. 

Where do you see your organization? Be honest! Chances are you rank your company towards the lower end of the pyramid. That’s where the majority operate. 

So what does it take to move up? As it is with individuals, healthy organizational behaviors are the result of good habits, born of discipline. When the right disciplines are combined into an effective strategic management system, excellence soon becomes a matter of habit. Along the way, greater discipline does not suppress creativity, but gives it necessary direction and boundaries. Senior leaders who progressively implement just enough structure at the right time, in the right place, and for the right reasons create beneficial habits and relentless progress.



Sources:

1. Crosby, P., 1979. Quality is Free. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-014512-1. 
2. Hewlett-Packard Process Consulting services, 1999. 
3. Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, 2013, 2013–2014 Criteria for Performance Excellence (Gaithersburg, MD: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/business_nonprofit_criteria.cfm).
4. Hendricks, K. and Singhal, V. March, 2000 “The Impact of Total Quality Management (TQM) on Financial Performance: Evidence from Quality Award Winners” DuPree College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology
5. Collins, J. and Hansen, M. T., 2011. Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos and Luck—Why Some Thrive Despite Them All. Cumulative stock returns, dividends reinvested. Invest $10K on 12/31/1972 and hold until 12/31/2002. © CRSP, Center for Research in Security Prices, Booth School of Business, the University of Chicago.

Remembering HP: Habitual Performance

“It’s just how we do things around here.”

I still recall the conversation between the Hewlett-Packard worker and the Tellabs manufacturing VP.  It was 1993, and we were on trip to HP’s Loveland Manufacturing Center, a key production facility in northern Colorado. Back then I sold HP test equipment in Illinois, and we were hosting a group of Tellabs executives on a benchmarking visit. My sales colleagues and I were building relationships and sharing manufacturing “best practices” with the hopes it would motivate them to buy more HP gear.

We were touring the production area and one of my customers pulled aside a passing worker, asking him about some charts hanging on the wall. The guy stopped for a few minutes and pointed to the diagrams, describing what each meant. “This one shows the count of defects by type. It looks like they were having a problem with the solder application. And over here, it looks like the adjustment dropped the defect rate by about 30%.”

A bulletin board labeled “PDCA Storyboard” prompted the interaction. A management presentation earlier in the day talked about the division’s Total Quality Management journey. HP used “Plan-Do-Check-Act” as its corporate improvement method, and the PDCA Storyboard showed the step-by-step progression. The presenter had made the bold statement that the quality practice was everywhere. It had become entrenched in the division’s operating system.

The Tellabs VP smiled and said, “So you’re saying you don’t work here but you can tell what this operation is doing?”

“Yeah. I’m on one of these quality teams in my area. We use PDCA to increase our yields, too.”

 “Come on. You’re not just a ‘plant’ walking by, an expert trying to impress us?” the executive chided him.

His response was working-man authentic. “No,” he said, shrugging. “It’s just how we do things around here.”

I could tell my customer was satisfied. He shook hands with the worker and thanked him. Without saying a word, I knew what he was thinking: It’s true. HP really is this good.

As a company HP was well respected, but it wasn’t because it was the most inventive. It didn’t come up with SPC or kanban or anything else the Tellabs executive hadn’t heard of. It wasn’t because HP only used the most advanced technology. The tour showcased some shiny, new equipment, but most was conventional and well used. It wasn’t because the company didn’t make mistakes. Over the years, the exec had dealt with the occasional HP hiccup. But where Tellabs and others would talk about fundamental change, HP would do it. And do it well.

HP had great people and great discipline. The company had a knack for studying something interesting, trying it on a small scale, refining it, rolling it out consistently, and making it all natural. Author Jim Collins calls this empirical creativity matched with fanatic discipline; direct engagement and practical experimentation followed up with utterly relentless execution in accordance with consistent aims, performance standards, and methods.¹ HP’s behavior, like other dynasty companies Collins studied, allowed it to dominate the test equipment industry for nearly seventy years.

Things have changed since 1993. The HP division became part of the Agilent Technologies spin-off, the manufacturing unit was offshored, and the HP brand has lost some of its luster since the time of “Bill and Dave.” Tellabs also changed. After heady growth, the company suffered from the telecom bubble burst; painful cutbacks, management changes, and eventual renewal as a networking products company.

I’ve changed, too. A career in sales led to marketing and operations, eventually leaving HP to start three companies and work for two more. Sparked by my time at HP, I spent many years exploring why some organizations performed consistently better than others. I learned and applied lessons in my own companies and others through the Baldrige program and the occasional consulting gig.

I’m convinced high performance boils down to simple, disciplined management systems that make people, planning, execution, and learning all more effective. It's true for organizations large and small, no matter the sector. But success always depends on great leadership and the tenacity to see it through. When excellence becomes a matter of organizational habit, long-term success is assured. 

And that’s what reminded me lately of the wisdom and discipline of a great company. Years ago they made it all happen, captured in one simple remark:

“It’s just how we do things around here.”

Footnote:

1. Collins, J. and Hansen, M. Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos, and Luck--Why Some Thrive Despite Them All. Harper Business, 2011. ISBN 0062120999.