Is your Company Leading or Firefighting?

Some companies never seem to have their act together. Others run like well-oiled machines. How does yours operate?  

Organizational behaviors exist on a continuum. From most chaotic at the base to most disciplined at the apex, the maturity pyramid shows where companies tend to fall. It was conceived by quality guru Philip Crosby¹ and later used in various forms by Hewlett-Packard,² the Baldrige Performance Excellence Program,³ and others. Where does your organization fit? 

1. Firefighting. The organization is highly reactive, relying on heroics to get things done. Success depends on circumstances, individual strengths, and plenty of luck. Getting sales is the primary focus, and any customer who buys is considered valuable. While the environment may be very creative, there’s typically a lot of stress and finger-pointing, customers are often disappointed, and mistakes are frequently repeated. The company does little to no planning, except possibly annual budgeting, and has limited employee training. 
2. Control. The organization becomes more aware of processes and takes steps to ensure consistency and repeatability. Checklists, inspection points, and reviews begin to appear, and more often groups coordinate their work. Sales qualification gets better as the company understands some customers are more valuable than others. Some metrics are in place, and annual planning begins to include goals and key initiatives. Execution is spotty, but improving. The company considers employee training important and screens new hires. 
3. Continuous Improvement. The organization uses formal techniques to systematically improve products, services, and the processes that produce them. Managers and staff are mostly proactive, with the exception of dealing with the occasional hiccup. Metrics are aligned and used extensively, and planning includes a clear vision with short-term and long-term goals. The company successfully executes about half of its planned initiatives. Market segmentation begins to drive development, marketing and sales strategy, and offerings get consistently better. Training is structured and delivered enterprise-wide. Executives carefully construct and manage supply and distribution chains. 
4. Optimization. The organization’s plans and processes are well aligned and integrated, and potential risks are often identified and resolved in advance. Through a history of continuous improvement and targeted innovation, the company has developed “core competencies” that create competitive advantages and open up entirely new markets. Despite its size, the organization is customer-focused, agile, and routinely introduces successful products and services. Enterprise-wide change initiatives are executed effectively. The company plans and manages human capacity and capability over a multi-year horizon. Cross-functional teamwork is high and organizational learning is methodical and widespread. 
5. Leadership. A market-maker, the organization uniquely balances the "yin and yang" of creativity and discipline. The company experiments incessantly with breakthrough ideas, carefully evaluating the ones that work, and only then scales up and introduces them. Competitors struggle to keep up. The press lionizes the company’s methods as “best practices." Despite perennial successes, the company remains on guard against complacency. It quickly detects disruptive shifts in technology, world events, and competitive innovations and mounts strategic responses. 

It’s probably no surprise that firefighting produces erratic outcomes. These companies tend to be new, small, or niche players, and they must fight to survive. Organizations with control orientations experience better success rates. Their customers are more often satisfied and buying again, and results are stable and predictable. These companies are “up-and-comers.” Firms doing a good job of continuous improvement are gaining ground, responding to market changes and becoming top competitors in their industries. Studies have shown that over a five-year period, these firms grow revenues and operating incomes twice as fast as those with control or firefighting behaviors.⁴ Companies optimizing performance are highly regarded and generally maintain top market positions. Examples include Boeing, IBM, Fed-Ex, and Toyota. Finally, a very small number of leading firms dominate their markets for fifteen years or more, producing at least ten times the return on shareholder equity than anyone else in the sector.⁵ They include Southwest Airlines, Intel, and Progressive Insurance. 

Where do you see your organization? Be honest! Chances are you rank your company towards the lower end of the pyramid. That’s where the majority operate. 

So what does it take to move up? As it is with individuals, healthy organizational behaviors are the result of good habits, born of discipline. When the right disciplines are combined into an effective strategic management system, excellence soon becomes a matter of habit. Along the way, greater discipline does not suppress creativity, but gives it necessary direction and boundaries. Senior leaders who progressively implement just enough structure at the right time, in the right place, and for the right reasons create beneficial habits and relentless progress.



Sources:

1. Crosby, P., 1979. Quality is Free. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-014512-1. 
2. Hewlett-Packard Process Consulting services, 1999. 
3. Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, 2013, 2013–2014 Criteria for Performance Excellence (Gaithersburg, MD: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/publications/business_nonprofit_criteria.cfm).
4. Hendricks, K. and Singhal, V. March, 2000 “The Impact of Total Quality Management (TQM) on Financial Performance: Evidence from Quality Award Winners” DuPree College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology
5. Collins, J. and Hansen, M. T., 2011. Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos and Luck—Why Some Thrive Despite Them All. Cumulative stock returns, dividends reinvested. Invest $10K on 12/31/1972 and hold until 12/31/2002. © CRSP, Center for Research in Security Prices, Booth School of Business, the University of Chicago.

Remembering HP: Habitual Performance

“It’s just how we do things around here.”

I still recall the conversation between the Hewlett-Packard worker and the Tellabs manufacturing VP.  It was 1993, and we were on trip to HP’s Loveland Manufacturing Center, a key production facility in northern Colorado. Back then I sold HP test equipment in Illinois, and we were hosting a group of Tellabs executives on a benchmarking visit. My sales colleagues and I were building relationships and sharing manufacturing “best practices” with the hopes it would motivate them to buy more HP gear.

We were touring the production area and one of my customers pulled aside a passing worker, asking him about some charts hanging on the wall. The guy stopped for a few minutes and pointed to the diagrams, describing what each meant. “This one shows the count of defects by type. It looks like they were having a problem with the solder application. And over here, it looks like the adjustment dropped the defect rate by about 30%.”

A bulletin board labeled “PDCA Storyboard” prompted the interaction. A management presentation earlier in the day talked about the division’s Total Quality Management journey. HP used “Plan-Do-Check-Act” as its corporate improvement method, and the PDCA Storyboard showed the step-by-step progression. The presenter had made the bold statement that the quality practice was everywhere. It had become entrenched in the division’s operating system.

The Tellabs VP smiled and said, “So you’re saying you don’t work here but you can tell what this operation is doing?”

“Yeah. I’m on one of these quality teams in my area. We use PDCA to increase our yields, too.”

 “Come on. You’re not just a ‘plant’ walking by, an expert trying to impress us?” the executive chided him.

His response was working-man authentic. “No,” he said, shrugging. “It’s just how we do things around here.”

I could tell my customer was satisfied. He shook hands with the worker and thanked him. Without saying a word, I knew what he was thinking: It’s true. HP really is this good.

As a company HP was well respected, but it wasn’t because it was the most inventive. It didn’t come up with SPC or kanban or anything else the Tellabs executive hadn’t heard of. It wasn’t because HP only used the most advanced technology. The tour showcased some shiny, new equipment, but most was conventional and well used. It wasn’t because the company didn’t make mistakes. Over the years, the exec had dealt with the occasional HP hiccup. But where Tellabs and others would talk about fundamental change, HP would do it. And do it well.

HP had great people and great discipline. The company had a knack for studying something interesting, trying it on a small scale, refining it, rolling it out consistently, and making it all natural. Author Jim Collins calls this empirical creativity matched with fanatic discipline; direct engagement and practical experimentation followed up with utterly relentless execution in accordance with consistent aims, performance standards, and methods.¹ HP’s behavior, like other dynasty companies Collins studied, allowed it to dominate the test equipment industry for nearly seventy years.

Things have changed since 1993. The HP division became part of the Agilent Technologies spin-off, the manufacturing unit was offshored, and the HP brand has lost some of its luster since the time of “Bill and Dave.” Tellabs also changed. After heady growth, the company suffered from the telecom bubble burst; painful cutbacks, management changes, and eventual renewal as a networking products company.

I’ve changed, too. A career in sales led to marketing and operations, eventually leaving HP to start three companies and work for two more. Sparked by my time at HP, I spent many years exploring why some organizations performed consistently better than others. I learned and applied lessons in my own companies and others through the Baldrige program and the occasional consulting gig.

I’m convinced high performance boils down to simple, disciplined management systems that make people, planning, execution, and learning all more effective. It's true for organizations large and small, no matter the sector. But success always depends on great leadership and the tenacity to see it through. When excellence becomes a matter of organizational habit, long-term success is assured. 

And that’s what reminded me lately of the wisdom and discipline of a great company. Years ago they made it all happen, captured in one simple remark:

“It’s just how we do things around here.”

Footnote:

1. Collins, J. and Hansen, M. Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos, and Luck--Why Some Thrive Despite Them All. Harper Business, 2011. ISBN 0062120999.

Scaling Up? Think Hamburgers.

Your new venture is catching fire and you need to ramp up operations quickly to handle demand. Where should you look for pointers? Try McDonald’s, Burger King or Wendy’s.

The Start-Up Genome Project analyzed thousands of high tech start-ups and found that successful companies progressed through four predictable phases. Dubbed the “Marmer Stages,” each involved a different set of objectives; Discovery was crafting and testing the idea, Validation was refining product features and generating initial orders, Efficiency was making customer acquisition and delivery processes repeatable, and Scale was ramping up and generating aggressive growth.¹ A successful mantra was “nail it, then scale it”—confirming that the product, marketing strategy, and business model all worked before stepping on the gas with big capital, staff, and infrastructure investments.

So what happens when the time comes for a start-up to scale in a big way? Suddenly the game changes from “tinkering” to “ramping,” generating volume quickly to establish market position and cash flow. It may sound silly to high tech entrepreneurs, but fast food franchises offer unique insights—they’ve made scaling up a science. Intel CEO Andy Grove looked closely at McDonald’s. In the late 1970’s, he believed Intel’s success depended on making their embryonic microprocessors as reliably as hamburgers, saying “We have to systematize things so we don’t crash our technology.” He kept a hamburger box on his desk with a mock logo, McIntel, to remind everyone of the strategy to grow with profitable scale.²

Franchisers offer four great lessons for quick and efficient early-stage expansion:

1.    Simplicity. Ordering “off-menu” may be fine for high-end restaurants, but fast food stores limit choice to what’s on the menu. Subway’s deli-style assembly and Burger King’s “Have it your way” only apply to a narrow range of options. Lesson: To scale, new companies must limit choices in the product offering. In the Validation stage, start-ups often “pivot,” experimenting with the product and pricing before they find something that sells. But every new version comes with added complexity, time, and hidden cost—documentation, training, software, accounting, and support. Pick your target; you can’t be all things to all people, so choose ONE profitable segment and stick to it. Rationalize your product line so that at least 80% of your sales come from just a few versions, and resist the temptation to add more. Product simplification is better for sales, too. Studies show too many choices confuses people, slows decision making and lowers satisfaction.³

2.    Standardization. In the fast food world, uniformity in supplies, equipment, training, software, and work processes promote consistency and quality, no matter where the franchise is located. Standardization also leads to economies of scale, which allows franchisers to improve performance and lower costs in their supply and distribution chains. Customers value predictability, which causes repeat visits, recurring revenue, and brand reinforcement. Lesson: As sales gain traction, consistency becomes essential to grow profitably and keep customers coming back. In the Efficiency stage, further refine product specifications, value propositions, and delivery processes, documenting best practices. Redesign if necessary to meet financial targets. Implement standard metrics and process checks to ensure consistency and quality. Consolidate anything that gives you purchasing leverage.

3.    Leadership. An industry expert states that if a franchise has a proven business concept with sound training and support, 40% of a franchisee’s success will come through their own hard work and talent.⁴ McDonald’s is renowned for careful selection and training of its franchise owners. Applicants must demonstrate past business success and financial resources (a new store typically requires a $1M+ investment). If they make the cut, they spend three days in a McDonald's restaurant, working and learning about the business. If they advance, franchisees must then spend a nine months at Hamburger University before opening a store.⁵ Lesson: Good leadership and development are essential for ramping up. Growing companies tend to promote from within and skimp on management training.  As a result, teams struggle and executives spend valuable time firefighting. In the Scale stage, look beyond top technical skills and choose leadership experience or attributes instead. Then, take sufficient time to develop the knowledge and skills required for good management.

4.    Strategic Management Systems. Opening new stores is a key business process for franchisers, meaning they take a systematic approach to planning, screening, contracting, implementing, and supporting new franchises. They deploy advanced Point of Sale (POS), staffing, and inventory management systems in each store to track real-time metrics, fill work schedules, and optimize supply chains. Visibility to rich data in turn facilitates learning and adjustment at corporate headquarters. Effective management and communication methods also promote execution across a distributed network. Many franchisers use regional or district managers to continually communicate, coordinate changes, and resolve issues with franchisees. Lesson: Entrepreneurs must develop mature management systems to support expansion during the Scale stage. Create a deployment plan and develop the right infrastructure. Define a small set of the most important metrics and implement systems to track, analyze, and report them. Develop enterprise-wide planning, execution, and review practices to align the increasingly complex organization, drive changes, and institute continuous learning and improvement. 

Start-ups are by nature quick-moving and creative, but adopting disciplines like those used by fast food franchises makes growth rapid and profitable. Making this transition is critical for early stage companies, and high volume operators can offer important lessons for every growing enterprise.

Footnotes:
1.    Compass blog: cracking the code of innovation, 2012. http://blog.startupcompass.co/tag/lean%20startup
2.    V. McElheny, 1977. “High Technology Jelly Bean Ace,” New York Times.
3.    B. Schwartz, 2005. The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less, Harper Perennial, ISBN 0060005696.
4.    G. Nathan, 2012. “Best Practice in Franchisee Selection,” Franchise Relationships Institute. http://www.franchiserelationships.com/articles/BestPracticesinFranchiseeEvaluation.html
5.    L. Magloff, 2013. “What You Need to Open a McDonald’s,” Chron http://smallbusiness.chron.com/need-open-mcdonalds-10513.html

The Best Meeting Agenda

Planning is easy. Execution is hard. How can a monthly meeting keep an organization persistently on track to achieve its goals? 

Nobody likes meetings, including me. People perceive them as time-wasters. Many have gone to “no PowerPoint” talks, got rid of chairs, or eliminated meetings entirely. In my view, these are extreme measures. Meetings serve a purpose. They provide important venues to communicate, learn, and make decisions. Yes, cut back on the number of meetings, but make the ones you keep more productive. 

I think the best meeting agenda is called a Monthly Business Review (MBR). It’s a formal meeting (yes, preparation is required) designed to check progress on key plans, projects, and business performance. What makes it the best? Unlike other meetings, the MBR ensures the organization executes its business plan. The alternative, of course, is to do what most companies do: make a plan, and after a few weeks just go back to what people were doing before the planning session. 

For an MBR, all functional heads and the CEO attend. A scribe and a timekeeper are assigned. Each manager has 15 minutes and may present only three slides. During the meeting, the scribe records issues and ideas that come up on a flip chart, and unless something requires immediate resolution, the topic is parked until the review is complete. The timekeeper also plays an important role. He or she prods managers to stay on topic lest the MBR lose focus and become interminably long. Here’s the agenda: 

• Welcome and Opening Remarks (CEO, 5 minutes) 
• Company-wide Dashboard Review (CEO, 10 minutes) 
• Functional Round-Robin (15 minutes each VP): 
• Dashboard Review
• Updates
• Successes
• Needs
• Hoshin Review (15 minutes for each strategy owner)
• Action Items (15 minutes)
• Other Items/Wrap-Up/Schedule Next Review (10 minutes) 

The first essential element is the dashboard, consisting of the top ten metrics at the enterprise level and for each function. The company-wide dashboard may list things like revenue, expenses and customer satisfaction, whereas the marketing dashboard may include impressions, web visits, and lead conversion rate. Each measure is color-coded: green says everything is going well, yellow indicates things may be going off track, and red means take immediate action. Red signals get special attention; the manager describes the problem’s root causes and the actions being taken. Dashboards show cause-and-effect relationships, allowing managers to view the organization as a living system. The review also keeps managers focused on keeping the fundamentals under control. It provides context for decision making; if a new idea or initiative doesn't positively impact a key metric, it’s probably not that important. 

The second essential element is the Hoshin Review. Hoshin kanri, a Japanese breakthrough improvement method, is an incredibly powerful tool for driving organizational alignment and change. During annual planning, the executive team collaboratively defines a mission-critical, breakthrough objective, along with supporting strategies, owners, and performance targets. An example hoshin objective may be, “Transform the sales process from a direct to a channel marketing and sales model” with goals to “increase annual revenue by 3x and reduce customer acquisition cost by 50%.” The objective is broken down into 3-5 major strategies and goals, such as “Recruit, contract, and implement third-party marketing relationships; goal of 3 by June 1.” Assigned strategy owners then form cross-functional teams and develop implementation plans. During the MBR, the Hoshin Review checks status, surfaces and removes any barriers to execution. 

Order is important: business fundamentals before hoshins. Why? If the basics are out of control, working on more advanced initiatives makes no sense. Make sure the foundation is solid prior to reaching for the breakthrough. 

Towards the end of the session, the scribe reviews any issues or ideas surfaced on the flip chart during the meeting, distilling them into action items, owners, and deadlines. Any outstanding action items from previous meetings not already addressed are also checked to make sure nothing falls through the cracks. 

Obviously some meeting preparation is involved. Functional leaders meet with their teams in advance, rolling up data, interpreting signals, and planning actions for their dashboard metrics. Hoshin strategy leaders check progress on their project plans. The CEO must also prepare. He or she must review the top-level, enterprise-wide metrics and be ready to help executives prioritize next steps. 

Work behind the scenes is also important. If the CEO notices chronic red signals or sluggish execution on hoshin strategies, he or she should meet separately with executives for 1-on-1 coaching sessions. Accountability for progress and results is important to maintain, but CEOs should avoid calling out individual struggles during the actual review. 

So what do you think? If you had to arrange a meeting, wouldn't an MBR be one of the most valuable? If the goal is moving the organization forward, perhaps there’s no better agenda.